Pictured: Henry Kissinbooger Bruce Notes:
AOL Time Warner has just put out a fluff piece that is aimed to poke fun at people who they call "conspiracists". They are saying that the only people who believe the group is for a 'new world order' are fringe conspiracy goofballs.
In its' simplest form, the only thing that conspiracy means is that events do not happen by accident, they are part of an agenda. Taken in that context, is that really not hard to believe? Yet the bosses of AOL Time Warner attend these secret meetings so it is not so surprising that they should throw innuendos in their story (although there should have been disclosure of their conflict of interest).
I actually see this as a victory, however. This is the first time that a media group has admitted that the Bilderbergs (world leaders, industry leaders, media leaders) do exist... and they do meet in secret.
Yet, oddly, they failed to answer a basic journalist question.
WHY?
The article also makes it sound like those who believe in the Bilderbergs are anti-Obama and this is the reason for all of this.
Untrue. Those of us who have looked into all of this know that Bush was a globalist as well as many presidents that were before him. Remember, it was George H.W. Bush that peppered his speeches back in the early 90's with the term "New World Order" and that term has been spoken from the lips of all the presidents after him (and many leaders before him).
People are waking up. Those who took risks to look silly will be vindicated.
http://news.aol.com/article/bilderberger-conspiracy/382953
